Forum for Parents in Timberlane School District Forum Index Forum for Parents in Timberlane School District
A place for timberlane parents to exchange thoughts
 
 FAQFAQ   SearchSearch   MemberlistMemberlist   UsergroupsUsergroups   RegisterRegister 
 ProfileProfile   Log in to check your private messagesLog in to check your private messages   Log inLog in 




Philisophical Differences

 
Post new topic   Reply to topic    Forum for Parents in Timberlane School District Forum Index -> Welcome to Timberlane Parents' Forum
View previous topic :: View next topic  
Author Message
therents



Joined: 29 Apr 2008
Posts: 142

PostPosted: Thu Jun 18, 2009 7:56 pm    Post subject: Philisophical Differences Reply with quote

Apparently the ski team coaches were let go due to philsophical differences. It is not clear what the philisophical differences were.


Can we use that same tactic with people we have philisophical differences with?
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Free Forum






PostPosted:      Post subject: ForumsLand.com

Back to top
Le Canard



Joined: 16 Jun 2008
Posts: 106
Location: Danville

PostPosted: Thu Jun 18, 2009 9:25 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

I am so frustrated with the School Board. They sat there tonight and allowed Mr. LaSalle dicate the meeting. He is an employee who reports to the School Board. The board acted like they have no say or control over the SAU. Who is running this ship. There are too many items to comment on so soon, as the meeting is not over.

Many reports tonight were rubber stamped with no comment or input of our elected officials. During the Technology Curriculum presentation they mentioned costs for listing links to web sites, what costs it is free? During the Technology Curriculum they discussed costs for staff development? Different topic, stick to curriculum not free trips to New Zealand where the software they want to purchase is developed.

During the Reading Curriculum Mr. LaSalle discussed an extra $90,000 he found to pay for next year? Why did they not give that $90,000 back to the taxpayers? Too much waste, too much rubber stamping and too many times the SB deferred to Mr. LaSalle. This was a school board meeting not a Mr. LaSalle Meeting. More Later.
_________________
Le Canard
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
LenMullen



Joined: 04 Nov 2008
Posts: 323
Location: Danville, NH

PostPosted: Fri Jun 19, 2009 12:51 am    Post subject: Re: Philisophical Differences Reply with quote

therents wrote:
Apparently the ski team coaches were let go due to philsophical differences. It is not clear what the philisophical differences were.


- they wanted to teach
- they had a lot of practices
- the kids got better after being with them
_________________
"I've been teaching here for 20 years so please don't assume that kids can add, subtract, multiply and divide integers without problems. Especially subtraction, as I found that many have trouble with." TRMS Math Teacher
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail Visit poster's website
Le Canard



Joined: 16 Jun 2008
Posts: 106
Location: Danville

PostPosted: Fri Jun 19, 2009 7:17 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

After sleeping on this a couple additional points are worth mentioning:

1. Taxpayers and parents of students are considered by Mr. LaSalle as "Spectators", versus the customer and people who pay his salary.

2. The students were passionate and claim the athletic director, on the job less than a year, never once attended a ski meet or ski team practice and was able to judge their performance.

3. It was reported that it was announced yesterday that Mr. and Mrs. T were chosen for a third time as ski coaches of the year in NH.

4. Per Mr. LaSalle after in the meeting, the unbudgeted $90,000 for technology came out of the book budget fund, similar to the $35,000 that was used from the book budget last year for the construction cost overruns. What books were budgeted for and why were they not purchased? $120,000 swings in spending appear to be chump change to the SAU.
_________________
Le Canard


Last edited by Le Canard on Fri Jun 19, 2009 12:17 pm; edited 1 time in total
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
TRHSparent



Joined: 29 Apr 2008
Posts: 147

PostPosted: Fri Jun 19, 2009 11:36 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Not a word for word quote but definately the attitude of the school administrators....."coaches coach, adminstrators administer, and parents are spectators". Funny but the spectators pay adminstrators' salaries and that's a very arrogant attitude from the superintendant.

Did you miss the approval of $8k for sending quarterly newsletter via US mail? Didn't we just approval saving money by not mailing the annual report? Am I missing the point here?

Also, if you're a senior and you still have a positive balance with nutrikids (lunch fund), you should contact to school to either transfer balance to a sibling or get refund. I'm not sure if you lose your money if under $20 balance and/or if the school will contact you via alertnow. That part of the meeting was confusing.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
LenMullen



Joined: 04 Nov 2008
Posts: 323
Location: Danville, NH

PostPosted: Fri Jun 19, 2009 11:37 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Once the budget is approved, Mr. La Salle can spend the money as he sees fit. A genuine budget committee would report these misappropriations and any citizen can ask for an accounting, but that does not happen.

The school board could remove Mr. La Salle if they did not concurr with his management of the budget, but, Mr. La Salle would have to script that into the school board agenda.

Elect new school board and budget committee members if you want accountability at TRSD.
_________________
"I've been teaching here for 20 years so please don't assume that kids can add, subtract, multiply and divide integers without problems. Especially subtraction, as I found that many have trouble with." TRMS Math Teacher
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail Visit poster's website
TRHSparent



Joined: 29 Apr 2008
Posts: 147

PostPosted: Fri Jun 19, 2009 11:50 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

LenMullen wrote:
The school board could remove Mr. La Salle if they did not concurr with his management of the budget, but, Mr. La Salle would have to script that into the school board agenda.

Very funny but sadly so true!
LenMullen wrote:
Elect new school board and budget committee members if you want accountability at TRSD.

Will you run for SB next year?
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
LenMullen



Joined: 04 Nov 2008
Posts: 323
Location: Danville, NH

PostPosted: Fri Jun 19, 2009 12:16 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

No. I have one more year on our mock budget committee.
_________________
"I've been teaching here for 20 years so please don't assume that kids can add, subtract, multiply and divide integers without problems. Especially subtraction, as I found that many have trouble with." TRMS Math Teacher
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail Visit poster's website
Le Canard



Joined: 16 Jun 2008
Posts: 106
Location: Danville

PostPosted: Fri Jun 19, 2009 12:21 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Does the School board have bylaws that state Mr. LaSalle runs the meeting?

Thank you to Mr. Baldwin for standing up for the correct thing and prevented the SAU from taking students unused lunch funds under a value of $20 versus returning the funds. There was too much discussion on why and how the SAU was going to confiscate tax payer money.
_________________
Le Canard
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
LenMullen



Joined: 04 Nov 2008
Posts: 323
Location: Danville, NH

PostPosted: Fri Jun 19, 2009 7:20 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

I'm going to humbly point you to the trsd tab on danvilledelivery.com. On the left margin you will find links to school board stuff and on the right you will find links to budget committee stuff.

Among the school board links, you will find one to their policies and procedures.

The answer to your question is no. Just as there is no budget committee rule that says we will sell the La Salle budget to the electorate.

The nature of these bodies is a reflection of the electorate. YOU elected people who choose to serve the administration instead of the taxpayers. Mr. La Salle has the taxpayers in check mate. The budget committee refuses to create the budget and default budget -- which is their constitutional obligation -- and the school board refuses to manage their ONLY employee. Until a taxpayer friendly school board and budget committee are elected, Mr. La Salle runs TRSD.

The SAU has a very smart business agent. He has worked hard to serve their goals. One of those goals was to nullify SB2 by creating a default budget equal to the proposed budget.

Get me two more friendlies on the budget committee and we'll approve bylaws that reassert the constitutional authority of the committee. That committee will draft a budget that advances the priorities of the community and an honest default budget.

Said bylaws will begin with a preamble that will state our constitutional authority and responsibilities.

The next part of the bylaws will describe our operating system...

* composition of the committee
* eligibility
* how members are elected
* requirement to read and understand RSA 32
* how vacancies are filled
* election of officers
* etc.

A section will describe our interface with the municipality -- how we will inform the community and how they will communicate with the committee.

The next part of the bylaws will describe our model of the budget. It's not possible for a budget committee to deal with the complexities of the day to day operation of a $60,000,000 enterprise. Our model would have big buckets -- staffing, operations, facilities, utilities, transportation, adult ed, special ed, athletics, projects, professional development, travel and living. We'll have the sau organize their data into our buckets and tag their expenses as legal requirements, contractual obligations, or discretionary spending so that we can set priorities.

The next part of the bylaws will be a description of the mechanics of our meetings/hearings. I'd replace the generic meeting agenda with a more detailed script: inputs, a process map, and outputs. Each bucket in our model will be addressed by a meeting/hearing where we will consult with experts (teachers, administrators, etc.) after having reviewed data supplied by the district. The output of the meeting will be a decision or an agenda for a followup meeting. For example, we would receive staffing change proposals and cost data in advance of our staffing meeting. We would have the opportunity to pose questions to the experts and then could approve or alter the budget request or ask for more data and schedule another meeting.

There would also 'informational' meetings where we would ask experts to educate us on their domain of expertise. We wouldn't want to do this annually, but we would want to capture the information for future review and training. Perhaps Mr. La Salle would describe the role of key administrative personnel. Maybe the facilities manager would explain the role of his team. We might ask the technology director to explain the entire technology program.

There would be 'special' meetings. Annual 'special' meetings would include those required by statute (Public Meeting, Deliberative Session) and a Review of Expenditures (RSA 32:22).

The final part of the bylaws would be a calendar. Since the budget is cyclical, I'd expect the meetings to become annual events. We'd work with the district to schedule the hearings after the data for a bucket is available but in advance or events dependent upon a decision (meet on staffing before the deadline for notification of affected personnel).

The problem is that when discussion turns in this direction, some members close their eyes, cover their ears, and chant, "roberts rules of order, roberts rules of order, roberts rules of order..." until the meeting is over. You can't see this because the meetings are not televised. If anyone wants to come to the meetings and video tape, I'll edit and post to danvilledelivery.com.
_________________
"I've been teaching here for 20 years so please don't assume that kids can add, subtract, multiply and divide integers without problems. Especially subtraction, as I found that many have trouble with." TRMS Math Teacher
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail Visit poster's website
PBealo
Site Admin


Joined: 29 Apr 2008
Posts: 309

PostPosted: Sun Jun 21, 2009 3:08 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Len,

Is there any RSA or internal rule that expicitly states that a Bud Com member can't also be a SB member??

Just curious. In the municipality planning arena RSA's clearly state that no more than one Planning Board member may also be a member of the ZBA.

Peter Bealo
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail
LenMullen



Joined: 04 Nov 2008
Posts: 323
Location: Danville, NH

PostPosted: Sun Jun 21, 2009 4:11 pm    Post subject: Is there a rule? Reply with quote

There is a rule that says a budcom member cannot be a member of the school board...
Quote:

32:15 Budget Committee Membership. –
I. The budget committee shall consist of:
(a) Three to 12 members-at-large, who may be either elected or appointed by the moderator, as the town or district adopting the provisions of this subdivision shall by vote determine, who shall serve staggered terms of 3 years; and
(b) One member of the governing body of the municipality and, if the municipality is a town, one member of the school board of each school district wholly within the town and one member of each village district wholly within the town, all of whom shall be appointed by their respective boards to serve for a term of one year and until their successors are qualified. Each such member may be represented by an alternate member designated by the respective board, who shall, when sitting, have the same authority as the regular member.
II. If the meeting decides that members-at-large are to be appointed, the staggering of terms shall begin that same year, with 1/3 of such members chosen to hold office for one year, 1/3 for 2 years, and 1/3 for 3 years, and each year thereafter 1/3 shall be chosen for terms of 3 years and until their successors are appointed and qualified. If the number of members-at-large is not divisible by 3, the division shall be as even as possible over the 3 years. All such appointments shall be made within 30 days after the annual meeting.
III. If the meeting decides members-at-large are to be elected, the meeting shall either elect the initial members for one-year terms by means other than by official ballot, or shall authorize the moderator to appoint members to serve until the next annual meeting, as provided in RSA 669:17. Elections for staggered terms, as described in paragraph II, shall not begin until that next annual meeting, and shall be by official ballot if the municipality has adopted the official ballot system, as set forth in RSA 669.
IV. A town or district which has adopted this subdivision may vote at any subsequent annual meeting to change the number or manner of selection of its members-at-large. No such change shall take effect until the annual meeting following the meeting at which the change was adopted.
V. No selectman, town manager, member of the school board, village district commissioner, full-time employee, or part-time department head of the town, school district or village district or other associated agency shall serve as a member-at-large. Every member-at-large shall be domiciled in the town or district adopting this subdivision and shall cease to hold office immediately upon ceasing to be so domiciled.
VI. One of the members-at-large shall be elected by the budget committee as chair. The committee may elect other officers as it sees fit. A member-at-large shall cease to hold office immediately upon missing 4 consecutive scheduled or announced meetings of which that member received reasonable notice, without being excused by the chair.
VII. In municipalities where members-at-large are appointed, the chair shall notify the moderator immediately upon the occurrence of any vacancy in the membership-at-large, and the vacancy shall be filled by appointment by the moderator within 5 days of such notification, otherwise by the budget committee. In municipalities where members-at-large are elected, vacancies shall be filled by appointment by the budget committee. Persons appointed to fill vacancies shall serve until the next annual meeting at which time a successor shall be elected or appointed to either fill the unexpired term or start a new term, as the case may be.
Source. 1993, 332:1, eff. Aug. 28, 1993. 1998, 141:1, 2, eff. Aug. 7, 1998.

_________________
"I've been teaching here for 20 years so please don't assume that kids can add, subtract, multiply and divide integers without problems. Especially subtraction, as I found that many have trouble with." TRMS Math Teacher
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail Visit poster's website
Free Forum






PostPosted:      Post subject: ForumsLand.com

Back to top
Display posts from previous:   
Post new topic   Reply to topic    Forum for Parents in Timberlane School District Forum Index -> Welcome to Timberlane Parents' Forum All times are GMT - 4 Hours
Page 1 of 1

 
Jump to:  
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum


Forum hosted by ForumsLand.com - 100% free forum. Powered by phpBB 2.